Bihar Politics: Upendra Kushwaha's MLA Expresses Displeasure Over Son's Ministerial Post, Cites Dynastic Politics

The political landscape of Bihar is currently abuzz with discussions. Surrounding internal strife within Upendra Kushwaha's Rashtriya Lok Morcha (RLM) party. These discussions gained significant traction following a bold statement from Rameshwar Mahto, a prominent MLA from the party, who openly voiced his strong disapproval of the party's leadership, while mahto explicitly expressed his deep dissatisfaction with the issue of dynastic politics, fueling speculation about a potential rift within the party ranks.

MLA's Stance Against Dynastic Politics

In an exclusive interview with India TV, Rameshwar Mahto articulated his concerns regarding the. Growing influence of dynastic politics within the Rashtriya Lok Morcha, led by Upendra Kushwaha. Mahto emphasized that his leader, Upendra Kushwaha, has consistently advocated for politics based on principles. Citing this very principle, Mahto clarified that he has raised his voice against dynastic practices. He further stated that he had not only conveyed his views to the media but had also previously expressed them publicly on social media platforms, and he remains steadfast in his position today. This statement highlights a significant ideological divergence within the party, where an MLA perceives a contradiction between his leader's declared principles and the current developments within the party.

Displeasure Over Son's Ministerial Appointment

The primary reason for MLA Rameshwar Mahto's discontent stems from the appointment of Upendra Kushwaha's son to a ministerial position, while mahto expressed his disagreement with this decision, stating that he has made his displeasure known, and it's now up to the leader to decide how to address the situation. Mahto also claimed that he isn't alone in feeling uneasy about this issue. He revealed that he had discussed the matter with the other two MLAs of the party, and they too are reportedly unhappy with this move. However, Mahto added that it would be their own decision when and how the other MLAs choose to express their dissatisfaction publicly. This assertion suggests that the discontent within the party may not. Be limited to a single individual but could have deeper roots.

MLA's Response to Potential Party Action

When questioned about his stance should the party take disciplinary action against him for his statements, Mahto responded with remarkable clarity. He asserted that his entry into politics wasn't for personal gain or position, but rather with the sole objective of public service. He firmly stated that if he isn't afforded the opportunity to. Serve society within politics, he would voluntarily withdraw from the political arena. This declaration underscores his commitment to his principles and his dedication to public service, while also indicating that he's unwilling to compromise on his stance, regardless of the potential political repercussions.

Absence from Litti Party and Rumor Refutation

MLA Mahto's absence from the recent 'Litti Party' hosted by Upendra Kushwaha had also sparked numerous conjectures. Clarifying his absence, Mahto explained that he had to travel to Delhi that evening, which prevented him from attending the party. He acknowledged receiving an invitation but stated that his travel commitments made his attendance impossible. Mahto also mentioned that he was unaware of the scale of the event, having initially thought it would be a small gathering with only family members and close associates. Also, Mahto vehemently refuted all rumors suggesting that the party was on the verge of a split and that all three MLAs would leave the party. He dismissed these claims as false and clarified that he has no contact with any other political party. While this statement attempts to quell reports of instability within the party, his fundamental grievance regarding dynastic politics remains a significant unresolved issue.