Election Commission: Congress Alleges Fraudulent Vote Deletion in Rajasthan SIR, Administration Clarifies

A significant controversy has emerged in Rajasthan concerning the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process for voter lists, while the Congress party has leveled serious allegations against the state administration, prompting a swift response and clarification from the Jaipur district administration. This dispute has raised questions about electoral transparency and democratic processes in the state, although the administration has firmly refuted the accusations.

Congress Levels Serious Allegations

On Tuesday evening, November 18, the Congress party posted a video on the social media. Platform 'X', making grave accusations regarding the deletion of names from the voter list in Jaipur. The party claimed that Booth Level Officers (BLOs) were fraudulently removing entire. Families from the voter list without visiting their homes or providing any forms. Congress termed this an 'attack on the constitution' and alleged that the SIR process was a 'game' designed to systematically target and remove names. The party further stated that lies were being told when reasons were sought, and that the deprivation of voting rights wouldn't be tolerated at any cost. These allegations have intensified political discourse in the state.

Administration's Swift Clarification and Fact Check

Following these serious allegations from Congress, the Jaipur District Collector and Magistrate promptly issued a 'fact check' through a post detailing the Election Commission's procedures. The administration explicitly stated that no voter's name has been finally deleted yet, nor has anyone been removed from the voter list. This entire process is merely part of a preliminary survey, aimed at updating and ensuring the accuracy of the voter list, while the administration emphasized that all procedures are being conducted strictly according to established rules and guidelines, ensuring fairness and adherence to electoral norms.

Understanding the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) Process

The administration provided a detailed explanation of the entire Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process. They clarified that the process of filling enumeration forms will continue until December 4, and this isn't the final deadline. It's a multi-stage process designed to give voters ample opportunity to update their details or add new names. The administration also noted that BLOs have visited many homes twice, but found residents absent. In such cases, a third visit is still pending, while if voters are found during the final visit, forms will be filled on the spot, ensuring that no legitimate voter's name is inadvertently removed from the list.

Future Steps and Safeguards

The administration also outlined the subsequent timeline for the publication of the voter list and the resolution of objections. On December 9, the draft voter list will be published. Following this, from December 9, 2025, to January 8, 2026, hearings will be conducted before the Electoral Registration Officers (EROs) for adding or deleting any names. During this period, concerned individuals will be given notice and a full opportunity to present their case. Also, an option is available for all voters to fill and submit enumeration forms online, allowing them to update their information from home. These measures are designed to ensure that the process remains transparent, accessible, and fair to all eligible citizens.

Importance of Voter Lists in a Democracy

The voter list is the backbone of any democratic process. Ensuring its accuracy and impartiality is a primary responsibility of the Election Commission and local administration. The allegations by Congress, even if refuted by the administration, highlight the. Critical importance of transparency and public trust in voter list revision processes. The detailed information and safeguards provided by the administration are intended to ensure that no eligible voter is disenfranchised and that the entire process is conducted fairly, while this controversy, ultimately, could serve as a catalyst for further strengthening and enhancing the reliability of the voter list, reinforcing democratic principles.