Uttar Pradesh / Big decision on Kashi Vishwanath-Gyanvapi campus, court orders archaeological survey

Zoom News : Apr 08, 2021, 05:30 PM
Varanasi. Kashi Vishwanath Temple has a big decision in the Kashi Vishwanath-Gyanvapi case. The Senior Division for the Archaeological Survey (Archaeological Survey) has decided to decide the survey in the Senior Division Fast Track Court. Civil Judge, Senior Division, Fast Track Court, Fast Track Court Ashutosh Tiwary has decided to survey the survey. The Court's decision is being considered as a big decision in favor of the people of Kashi Vishwanath temple side. Court has issued orders on the case coming from 1991 to the survey. Court has directed that the entire campus should be studied by creating a team of 5 people of the Archeology Department of Center.

In this case the ancient statue self-proclaimed Jyotirling Lord Vishweshwar versus Anjuman arrangements are two parties face-to-face. Appeal to conduct an archaeological survey of Vishwanath Temple Complex, including Vishwanath Temple, including Vishwanath Mosque, was appealed by the Appeal Civil Judge (Senior Division - Fast Track Court) on behalf of Lord Vishweshwashtranath. Meanwhile, on behalf of Muslim party, ASI and Uttar Pradesh Archeology also registered objection to the demand for survey on behalf of the temple party. It is known that Kashi Vishwanath temple is also located in the Gyanwapi Masjid, whose lawsuit is going on in the local court since 1991. Since the last 1 year, after the rules of staying from the Supreme Court, the hearing of this matter has started once again in the Varanasi Court. Hindu Party is demanding this entire area to make archaeological surveys from ASI.

In the case of Wadi Shadi District Government Advocate (Civil) Vijay Shankar Rastogi said that in 1991, the filed laws were demanded that in which it was demanded that the Mosque Jyotirling is a part of the temple. Where Hindu is the right to worship, philosophy and mercantile. This demand from the court filed ancient statue self-proclaimed Jyotirling Lord Visiteshwar Pandit Somnath Vyas and others. Anjuman Arjamia Mosque and other opposition in the trial. Two legisics who filed a lawsuit Ramarang Sharma and Pandit Somnath Vyas have died. After which Waditra East District Government Advocate (Civil) Vijay Shankar Rastogi, who is represented in the place of Wadi Pandit Somnath Vyas, has said in the prayer that the self-proclaimed Vishweshwanath is still established in the alleged controversial campus. It is from twelve jyotirling of the country and the Muslims have made the mosque by capturing the temple premises. In August 15, 1947, the format of the disputed complex was the temple. Now the plaintiff appealed to the court by the Department of Archaeological Survey by the Department of Archaeological Survey by the Court and appealed to the report by digging the campus.

Viti Vijay Shankar Rastogi explains that on behalf of the Muslim side, the controversy was raised that the religious situation of the disputed site i.e. the religious situation of the Gyanwapi Mosque was of the mosque on August 15, 1947 and the ongoing trial should be canceled on this basis. While keeping his side on behalf of the Hindu side, he was told in the court that the knowledgeable mosque of the entire Vishwanath temple premises is a disputed fraction and should be based on evidence for determining religious condition, so the first to take evidence of the entire knowledgeable campus Additional District was ordered by New Delhi in 1998.

His Muslim party went to the rit petition in the High Court. For this reason its action was postponed for quite a long time. Now after the establishment of the establishment of the entire Gnetic Complex, the ASI, New Delhi and Archeology Department has been requested to issue the UP Government by continuing the UP Government through the court that through the Radar, Viseshwar Jyotirling is sitting under the place of the dome in the middle of the disputed site, reflect it and take evidence of the entire knowledgeable premises. For this, the prayer was filed in the court of the Civil Judge (Senior Division-Fast Track Court).

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER