ED Attaches Anil Ambani's Mumbai Residence Worth Over 3716 Crore Rupees

The Enforcement Directorate has provisionally attached Anil Ambani's 17-story residence 'Abode' in Mumbai's Pali Hill, valued at ₹3,716.83 crore. The action is part of a money laundering probe involving alleged bank fraud by Reliance Communications. Total attachments in this case have now reached approximately ₹15,700 crore.

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Wednesday provisionally attached 'Abode', the 17-story residence of Reliance Group Chairman Anil Ambani located in Mumbai's upscale Pali Hill area. According to officials, the action was taken under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in connection with an ongoing investigation into alleged bank fraud involving Reliance Communications (RCOM). 83 crore. This significant enforcement action follows a series of financial investigations into the group's operations and debt management practices.

Architectural and Financial Details of 'Abode'

Anil Ambani's residence, 'Abode', is situated in the high-profile Pali Hill neighborhood of Mumbai and is considered one of the most expensive private residences in India. Standing 66 meters tall, the 17-story building is known for its luxury and state-of-the-art facilities. 83 crore. The provisional attachment order means that the property can't be sold, transferred, or encumbered while the legal proceedings under the PMLA are active. This move marks a significant escalation in the federal agency's pursuit of assets linked to the alleged financial irregularities.

The RCOM Bank Fraud Case Background

The attachment is rooted in a money laundering investigation stemming from alleged bank fraud committed by Reliance Communications (RCOM). The ED alleges that the company diverted funds obtained from various banks and engaged in money laundering activities. With this latest action, the total value of assets attached by the agency in the RCOM case has reached approximately ₹15,700 crore. Investigators are scrutinizing the flow of funds to determine if the proceeds of crime were utilized in the acquisition or construction of high-value assets like the Pali Hill residence. The probe involves analyzing complex financial structures and cross-border transactions.

Procedural History and Future Interrogations

Anil Ambani, 66, is expected to face a second round of questioning by the federal agency in the near future. He had previously appeared before the ED in August 2025, where his statement was recorded under the provisions of the PMLA. Officials indicate that the upcoming summons will focus on specific details regarding the diversion of bank loans and the ownership structure of the attached properties. The agency is building a comprehensive case to establish the link between the alleged fraud and the personal assets of the promoters. The legal process will now move to the PMLA Adjudicating Authority for confirmation of the attachment.

Context of Reliance Communications' Financial Crisis

Reliance Communications, once a flagship entity of the Anil Ambani-led group, has been embroiled in severe financial distress for several years. The company is currently undergoing the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) due to its inability to service massive debts owed to a consortium of banks. Anil Ambani has faced multiple legal challenges, including personal guarantee claims and contempt proceedings in various courts. The attachment of his primary residence is seen as a major development in the ongoing legal and financial struggles of the industrialist and his business empire.

Legal Framework and Enforcement Directorate's Mandate

The Enforcement Directorate's mandate under the PMLA allows for the provisional attachment of properties believed to be 'proceeds of crime'. This action is part of a broader strategy to recover funds and ensure that assets linked to financial crimes are secured, while according to officials, the investigation is ongoing, and further attachments of assets belonging to the group or its associates can't be ruled out. The agency is collaborating with other financial regulators and banks to trace the ultimate beneficiaries of the diverted funds. The legal battle is expected to continue as the group may challenge the attachment order in the appropriate judicial forums.