In a significant political development that could reshape the administrative landscape of Pakistan, a Senate committee has officially labeled 25 federal ministries as unconstitutional and fake. The committee has issued a stern recommendation to the government led by Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, urging the immediate dissolution of these departments. According to the committee's findings, the existence of these ministries is a direct violation of the constitutional framework established in 1973. The committee asserted that the federal government has overstepped its boundaries, encroaching upon the rights and jurisdictions of the provinces. This move is seen as a major challenge to the current federal structure, as the committee demands the immediate removal of all ministers and high-ranking officials associated with these 25 departments.
The List of Redundant Ministries
The Senate committee has specifically identified several high-profile ministries that it believes shouldn't exist at the federal level. Among the 25 ministries marked for dissolution are the Ministry of Railways, the Ministry of Petroleum, the Ministry of Water Resources, the Ministry of Health, and the Ministry of Education. The committee argues that these sectors are primarily provincial subjects or require a different governance model as per the constitution. By maintaining these as federal entities, the government is accused of maintaining an illegal administrative layer that bypasses the intended decentralization of power. The recommendation to dissolve these ministries includes a call for the immediate termination of the roles of the ministers and bureaucrats currently heading these departments, as their positions are deemed illegitimate under the current constitutional interpretation provided by the committee.
Constitutional Violations and Article 124
The basis for labeling these 25 ministries as fake lies in the 1973 Constitution of Pakistan. Reports from the Dawn newspaper indicate that the Senate committee believes the government has deviated from the provisions implemented decades ago, while a key point of contention is Article 124 of the Pakistan Constitution, which stipulates that departments such as Railways, Petroleum, and Water are matters involving both the state and the center. The committee pointed out that the federal government can't take unilateral decisions on these subjects. For such matters, the Constitution provides for the Council of Common Interest (CCI). This council is a high-level body consisting of the Prime Minister, the four Chief Ministers of the provinces, and three federal cabinet ministers. The committee argues that by operating these as independent federal ministries, the government is ignoring the mandatory role of the CCI and the collaborative federalism envisioned in the constitution.
The Federal Legislative List and the Rule of Nine
The Senate committee further supported its recommendation by citing Part-1 of the Federal Legislative List. According to this list, the federal government is authorized to maintain control over only 9 specific departments, while all other subjects should be left to the provinces. The 9 departments permitted under federal jurisdiction include Defense, Foreign Affairs, Finance, Commerce, Communication, Maritime Affairs, Science and Technology, Law and Justice, and Parliamentary Affairs. The committee maintains that any ministry operating outside of these 9 core areas is an encroachment on provincial autonomy. By expanding the federal cabinet to include 25 additional ministries, the government is seen as violating the legal boundaries set by the legislative list, leading to an oversized and unconstitutional federal government.
Economic Impact and Financial Loss
Beyond the legal and constitutional arguments, the Senate committee highlighted a staggering economic cost associated with these 25 ministries. The committee stated that the operation of these additional and unnecessary departments results in an annual loss of 5 trillion dollars. This massive expenditure is attributed to the salaries, perks, administrative costs, and operational budgets of the ministers and officials who lead these unconstitutional entities. In a country facing severe economic challenges, the committee views this 5 trillion dollar expenditure as a non-essential burden that the national treasury can no longer afford. The recommendation to dissolve these ministries is Because of this presented not only as a legal necessity but also as a critical fiscal measure to save the country from unnecessary financial drainage.
Context of National Unrest and System Failure
This report comes at a time when Pakistan is grappling with widespread unrest across various regions, including Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Balochistan, and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), while the internal stability of the country is under pressure, and the Senate committee's findings add another layer of complexity to the government's challenges. Recently, Pakistan's Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi made a candid admission, stating that the current system has effectively collapsed. While the government maintains these 25 ministries, the common citizens are struggling with rising petroleum prices and unresolved issues in the education and health sectors. On top of that, major provinces like Sindh and Punjab continue to engage in disputes over water distribution, highlighting the failure of the current federal-provincial coordination. The committee's report suggests that the existence of these unconstitutional ministries has failed to solve the fundamental problems of the people, while simultaneously draining the nation's resources.
